college football aa rankings
How stupid is Sagarin ratings and the overall BCS formula?

I'm just looking for some teams ahead of # 6 in WVU Sagarins: Boston College, Georgia, Missouri, St. Arizona, Northern Iowa. These are used in the BCS ranking. Unbelievable. This is how pathetic football of the university because they do not have a second phase. They are using BS computer rankings have I-AA Northern Iowa in the Top 10. According to .... Sagarin I-AA Northern Iowa is better than all but 9 teams Division IA. How pathetic is that? I was talking about the part used by the BCS. It is what matters. As to your schedule WVU, which easily beat Miss St (wins over Auburn, Kentucky) the deployment of a first quarter 28-0 advantage. In addition, the road wins against Rutgers 31-3 is impressive. The offense is outstanding, the defense has worked very well and the whole team is finally clicking. Who has played Ohio St? Or Kansas?? We must be as much in the mix as anyone else.

The problem is not with Sagarin, the CC is taking one of the formulas Sagarin (ELO chess) for classification. Actually if you look at total Sagarins survey, you will see three classifications. Sagarins general classification of the WV is # 7, ahead of BC, Mizz, Georgia and even Iowa N.. Its lower-level predictor that takes the results of the past and makes an assumption of victories against opponents that the teams future rows has the best chance to win your schedule Left (Oregon is # 1 in this ranking, is WVU # 4). Once again, the CC chooses to use the ELO chess ranking states Sagarin in his explanation, "is less precise in their predictions for the coming games. "ELO-Chess In only win or lose no matter the score margin.

Head Football Coach, Todd Knight , Press Conference 4 24 09

Tagged with: • • • •

Filed under: College football

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!