college football week 2 schedule
What would be wrong with this plan for a national championship?

You take the 6 major conference winners. ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac10, SEC and the Big East. More than 2 teams and put them in the large main Bowl four games. Rose Bowl, Orange Bowl, Sugar Bowl, Fiesta Bowl of the four winners will a BCS Final 4, which takes place the week after. The winners in the BCS championship. Just add one extra game to the College Football Schedule. You can run BCS Championship Saturday night in January. It seems like a simple solution. Bowl Games Maintains important and you have four teams go and play for the national title.

Nothing would be wrong with that. It would diminish the importance of the regular season, but only slightly. In fact, I could not go with points guaranteed to Conference winners when (the point in the case, look at the Big-12 and ACC this year.) You still have disputes because you have to select participants on the basis of where they are at the polls, while giving preference to a team that won their conference is one. If you want a purer form of a post-season football the NCAA, you should seed the teams based on their body of work as they do in college basketball. By taking the top 8 teams in the BCS and let them score Due out in late December, consecutive Saturdays, it should end with a conclusion of the college season around the same date as it is now, without interfering in the NFL playoffs. By the way, Kimtastic ... Louisville and Rutgers are in the Big East (one of any "power") not to have been left out of that stage. The other teams you mentioned, if they played a tough schedule enough (with all of the conference game, not against big opponents), which would consideration. And, Christopher M, Michigan came in 2nd in the Big Ten (beat Wisconson head to head). Once again, Kim, Rutgers is in the Big East ... under the proposed plan, which would be the winner of the conference (the champion of the Big East BCS conference has a guaranteed bowl bid making the conference a "power"). As to a WAC school is ... Are you saying that if Boise State (WAC school, currently at # 8 BCS) schedule loaded with Michigan, Ohio State, and USC, and beat 3 of them would not be playing for the title this year? Stop being silly. In the last couple of years, Kim, USC has played at least one Mountain West or WAC opponent each season (except this year). Michigan and Ohio State always play the MAC schools. Florida also does (WAC, Mountain West, Conf. USA, Sun Belt). Boise State generally receive at least one game per year against opponents of major conferences (including the Pac 10). So yeah ... I think the major powers are willing to play the smaller schools, Despite these small schools was defeated. In fact, last year after playing Cal, USC, Fresno State brought in Collesium, and beat them. His logic is simply wrong. Even in the generalization can not support his point of view. There are a number of other important programs that schedule the same way as Michigan, OSU, USC, Florida, etc do. No matter how you want to cast a wide net, you will not find anything that would lend credibility to his argument. Sometimes, Kim, when you're wrong ... you just wrong.

Sports Betting College Football Week 2 Trends From Gamblers Television

Tagged with: • • • •

Filed under: College football

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!