espn college football oregon state
Why do many people whine about the BCS?

Why is it so important that college football has a national champion? The only teams playing 12-13 games, it is impossible for the combinations that are set outside of the conferences that truly test equipment. Peanut Butter realistic basketball can win half of their conference games after a tear during March Madness and surprise are the champions. Why should fans expect both Football? Do you really think the polls are the preseason Top 25 for the cold? The best team in the country could not only be those which are on paper. (Ask Michigan) If Michigan was fifth, how good it was Appalachian State? Was it a coincidence? If so, how good was the Oregon team that beat Michigan week next? There is no way to determine a national champion unless a playoff was set for a minimum of 16 teams, and probably should have more. ESPN and sort of the idea of BS-traffickers simply need STHU, focus on the conference championships, then solid bowl hand in hand, as the BCS is better than it was.

Well, someone who thinks like me ... There are two reasons why people complain much about the BCS. 1. There team did not do ... 2. hate computers that do not .... But if you do a second phase you have to be 16 teams only to find the number of stupid 17th team to complain. Then there will be endless debates about the selection process. Then many fans are complaining because their team was not chosen to go. The fans expect too much and if there was a second phase, they would find new reasons to complain ..

Top 10 2010 NFL Draft Eligible Prospects Oregon State Beavers

Tagged with: • • • •

Filed under: College football

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!